|
|
|
| United States Patent | 3942377 |
| Link to this page | http://www.wikipatents.com/3942377.html |
| Inventor(s) | Ginzburg; Arkady Savelievich (ULITSA Moskovskaya 266, korpus 2, kv. 47, Riga, SU);
Gurevich; Genrikh Georgievich (ULITSA Palangas 11, kv. 78, Riga, SU);
Kirshtein; Generik Khaimovich (ULITSA Moskovskaya, 218, kv. 61, Riga, SU);
Kvasnevsky; Igor Porfirievich (ULITSA Pavlova 17, kv. 59, Riga, SU);
Yakushonok; Vladimir Ivanovich (ULITSA Auseklya 3, kv. 21, Riga, SU);
Levin; Mikhail Naumovich (ULITSA Boldyreva, 6, kv. 46, Kaliningrad Moskovskoi oblasti, SU) |
| Abstract | An electromagnetic flowmeter comprising an alternating current magnetic
system embracing a section of a pipeline with electrodes attached thereto
for removing potentials proportional to the flow rate of the medium and a
metering circuit for converting the signals from the electrodes to an
output signal proportional to the flow rate of the medium, characterized,
according to the invention, in that the pipeline has additional electrodes
attached thereto for removing potentials proportional to the eddy currents
in the medium, with the metering circuit being made as a comparison
circuit whose one input is connected to the main electrodes and the other
to the additional electrodes. |
|
|
|
Title Information  |
|
|
|
|
|
Drawing from US Patent 3942377 |
|
|
Electromagnetic flowmeter |
|
| Inventor |
Ginzburg; Arkady Savelievich (ULITSA Moskovskaya 266, korpus 2, kv. 47, Riga, SU);
Gurevich; Genrikh Georgievich (ULITSA Palangas 11, kv. 78, Riga, SU);
Kirshtein; Generik Khaimovich (ULITSA Moskovskaya, 218, kv. 61, Riga, SU);
Kvasnevsky; Igor Porfirievich (ULITSA Pavlova 17, kv. 59, Riga, SU);
Yakushonok; Vladimir Ivanovich (ULITSA Auseklya 3, kv. 21, Riga, SU);
Levin; Mikhail Naumovich (ULITSA Boldyreva, 6, kv. 46, Kaliningrad Moskovskoi oblasti, SU) |
|
|
|
| Publication Date |
March 9, 1976 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Filing Date |
July 27, 1973 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title Information  |
|
|
Description  |
|
|
The present invention relates to flow measurements in electroconducting
media and, more particularly, to an electromagnetic flowmeter, and can be
applied to flow measurements in liquids with ionic conductivity and metals
in the metallurgical, chemical, nuclear and other industries.
Known in the prior art are electromagnetic non-contact flowmeters for
electroconducting media based on the interaction between the variable
travelling magnetic field and the fluid. Their readings are independent of
the magnetic induction magnitude and conductivity of the medium. No
preliminary calibration is required for such flowmeters.
In particular, a non-contact flowmeter is known to have a sinusoidal
pulsating magnetic field distributed along the pipeline. The flowmeter
comprises inductors for setting up and receiving the magnetic field and an
indicator.
A disadvantage of such a flowmeter resides in that the value of the signal
therein is proportional to the medium conductivity.
Therefore, such a flowmeter is inadequate for measuring low-conducting
media when the magnitude of the signal becomes commensurable with
interferences.
Also known in the art is an electromagnetic flow-meter comprising an
alternating current magnetic system embracing a section of a pipeline with
electrodes attached thereto, whose output signal proportional to the flow
rate of the medium is removed with the aid of a metering circuit.
The value of this signal is determined by a number of factors among which
is the magnitude and character of distributing the magnetic field over the
area where the pipeline with the electrodes is located. The latter is
determined both by the type of the magnetic system and by the accuracy of
placing it on the pipeline. Therefore, to ensure high-accuracy
measurement, it is necessary to calibrate the electromagnetic flowmeter
for each particular case, which, in some cases, e.g. when employing the
flowmeter for measuring aggressive media, may turn out to be complicated
and expensive.
In the process of operation, need also arises for a control calibration
which is often difficult to carry out or undesirable, e.g. in the case of
a continuous cycle.
An object of the invention is to eliminate special calibration when
installing and replacing the magnetic system, as well as control
calibrations in the course of operation, thereby improving the reliability
and accuracy of measurement.
In attaining this object, the section of the pipeline embraced by an
alternating current magnetic system includes, according to the invention,
in addition to the main electrodes for removing potentials proportional to
the flow rate with the aid of a metering circuit, additional electrodes
for removing potentials proportional to the eddy currents in the medium,
and the metering circuit is made as a comparison circuit whose one input
is connected to the main electrodes, and the other input, to the
additional electrodes.
The electrodes are arranged on the pipeline according to the type of
magnetic system used.
When using an alternating current magnetic system setting up a magnetic
flux, which is not equal to zero, in the closed loop of the pipeline, the
additional electrodes are arranged along the generatrices of the pipeline,
passing through each main electrode.
When using an alternating current magnetic system setting up a magnetic
flux equal to zero along the axis of the pipeline, the additional
electrodes are arranged along the generatrix of the pipeline, passing
through one of the main electrodes.
When using an alternating current magnetic system setting up a magnetic
field distributed sinusoidally along the axis of the pipeline, the
additional electrodes are arranged along the generatrix of the pipeline,
passing through one of the main electrodes, each additional electrode
being arranged with respect to the main electrode at a distance equal to
one-fourth of the spatial wave length of the magnetic field.
When using an alternating current magnetic system setting up a magnetic
field distributed sinusoidally along the axis of the pipeline, the main
and additional electrodes are arranged along one generatrix of the
pipeline, the adjacent electrodes being spaced at one-fourth of the
spatial wave length of the magnetic field.
An electromagnetic flowmeter embodying the present invention helps to
attain the above objects.
To better understand the nature of the invention, a more detailed
description of embodiments there of is given below with reference to the
accompanying drawings, wherein:
FIG. 1 represents an embodiment of the magnetic system in an
electromagnetic flowmeter of the present invention setting up a magnetic
flux which is not equal to zero in the closed loop of a pipeline;
FIG. 2 is a block diagram of an electromagnetic flowmeter with the magnetic
system of FIG. 1;
FIG. 3 illustrates one of the ways in which the magnetic field is
distributed along the axis of a pipeline when the flowmeter employs a
magnetic system setting up a magnetic flux equal to zero along the axis of
the pipeline;
FIG. 4 shows a section of a pipeline with main and additional electrodes
attached thereto, according to the invention, when using a magnetic system
with the magnetic field distributed along the axis of the pipeline as
shown in FIG. 3;
FIG. 5 illustrates a sinusoidal distribution of the magnetic field along
the axis of a pipeline, set up by the alternating current magnetic system;
FIG. 6 shows a section of a pipeline with additional electrodes arranged
along the generatrix passing through one of the main electrodes at a
distance equal to one-fourth of the spatial wave length of the magnetic
field set up along the axis of the pipeline, as shown in FIG. 5;
FIG. 7 shows a section of a pipeline with the main and additional
electrodes arranged intermittently along one generatrix, with adjacent
electrodes being spaced at one-fourth of the spatial wave length of the
magnetic field for the embodiment of the magnetic system setting up a
magnetic field distributed sinusoidally along the axis of the pipeline.
The electromagnetic flowmeter comprises an alternating current magnetic
system 1 (FIG. 1) embracing a section of a pipeline 2 accommodating main
electrodes 3 (FIG. 2) for removing potentials proportional to the flow
rate of the medium and additional electrodes 4 for removing potentials
proportional to the eddy currents. The main and additional electrodes 3
and 4 are connected to the inputs of a metering circuit 5. The metering
circuit represents a comparison circuit and comprises a summing unit 6
whose inputs are connected to two or more pairs of the additional
electrodes 4, amplifiers 7 and 8 whose inputs are connected to the output
of the summing unit 6 and the main electrodes 3, respectively, detectors 9
and 10 whose inputs are connected to the outputs of the amplifiers 7 and
8, a comparison unit 11 whose inputs are connected to the detectors 9 and
10 and whose output is connected to an indicator instrument 12. The
summing unit 6 is made, e.g. as an operational amplifier with a plurality
of inputs, while the comparison unit 11 may be made as a differential D.C.
amplifier. If only one pair of additional electrodes is attached to the
pipeline, the unit 6 is eliminated from the metering circuit 5 and the
additional electrodes 4 are directly connected to the input of the
amplifier 7.
When the alternating current magnetic system 1 is energized, currents of
two types appear in the pipeline 2. These are, firstly, eddy currents due
to variations of the magnetic field in time, and, secondly, currents
proportional to the flow rate of the medium. Accordingly, the distribution
of the electrical potential associated both with the eddy currents and
with the currents proportional to the flow occurs over the surface of the
pipeline. A signal proportional to the flow rate taken is from the main
electrodes 3, and a signal proportional to the eddy currents is taken from
the additional electrodes 4. The electrical potentials of these signals
are shifted in phase by 90.degree., with the phase of the signal
proportional to the flow coinciding with the induction phase. Owing to the
phase relationships mentioned above, these potentials can be separated
while taking measurements. The prior-art electromagnetic flowmeter employs
the measurement of a potential proportional to the flow.
In addition to the main electrodes 3 for removing the signal proportional
to the flow rate, use is also made of the additional electrodes 4 to
remove the signal proportional to the eddy currents thereof.
The signals from the main and additional electrodes equally depend on the
magnitude of the magnetic field induction. Besides, the difference of
potentials being removed from the additional electrodes 4 arranged along
the pipeline 2 and the difference of potentials being removed from the
main electrodes 3 equally depend on the distribution of the magnetic field
in space.
The signal from the main electrodes 3 is amplified by the amplifier 8 and
passes on to the phase-sensitive detector 10 producing a signal
proportional to the flow rate.
The signal from the additional electrode 4 is summed up in the unit 6 if
the number of the additional electrodes exceeds two to be subsequently
amplified by the amplifier 7 and detected by the phase-sensitive detector
9 producing a signal proportional to the eddy currents.
The output voltages from the units 9 and 10 are compared in the comparison
unit 11 whose output voltage is measured by the instrument 12.
The transformation coefficients of the signals from the main and additional
electrodes being equal, the output signals of the detectors 9 and 10 are
equal when the flow rate is proportional to the frequency of the magnetic
field, the distance between the additional electrodes and the diameter of
the pipeline. It is precisely this that makes it possible to calibrate the
flowmeter in the course of operation.
Measurements can be taken by various methods. It is possible, for example,
to vary the frequency .omega. of feeding the magnetic system until the
instrument 12 reads zero. In this case, the rate of flow of the medium is
found from the formula:
V = (.omega..DELTA./2) (I)
where .DELTA. is the distance between the additional electrodes.
It is also possible to measure the voltage difference across the output of
the comparison unit 11 at a fixed frequency of the magnetic field. Since
it is possible to ensure a 100 per cent deflection of the pointer of the
instrument 12 at V = 0, taking into account the linear dependence of the
readings on the rate of flow and the fact that the instrument will read
zero at rate of flow determined by the relation (I), the flow rate can be
measured by directly reading the instrument 12.
In the flowmeter employing an alternating current magnetic system setting
up a magnetic flux which is not equal to zero in the closed loop of the
pipeline, the additional electrodes 4 should be arranged along the
generatrices of the pipeline 2 passing through each one of the main
electrodes 3 (FIGS. 1 and 2). This is explained by the fact that under the
effect of the magnetic flux which is not equal to zero, currents circulate
through the closed loop of the pipeline 2 embraced by the magnetic system
under consideration inducing electromotive forces in the electrodes 4
causing errors in measurements. To eliminate the effect of these currents,
the signals from both pairs of the additional electrodes 4 are fed to the
summing unit 6 wherein useful signals proportional to the eddy currents
are summed up, and signals proportional to the currents circulating
through the loop due to the magnetic flux which is not equal to zero are
subtracted. The signal from the summing unit 6 is fed to the amplifier 7
and subsequent operating conditions are similar to those already
described.
For the case when an alternating current magnetic system is used wherein
the magnetic flux equal to zero is set up along the axis of the pipeline
2, only two additional electrodes 4 (FIGS. 3, 4) will be sufficient.
The device operates in the same manner as the one described above.
The magnetic system setting up a magnetic flux equal to zero along the axis
of the pipeline can be provided, for example, by a linear inductor.
With the sinusoidal distribution of the magnetic field along the axis of
the pipeline 2 (FIG. 5), which can be accomplished by the linear inductor
with a preset distribution of the linear current load, it is expedient
that the additional electrodes 4 be arranged at a distance equal to
one-fourth length of the magnetic field wave .lambda. along the generatrix
passing through one of the main electrodes 3 (FIG. 6).
In this case, the device operates in a manner similar to that described
above, with the only distinction being that instead of relation (I) use
should be made of the relation:
V = (.omega..lambda./2.pi.) (2)
with a sinusoidal magnetic field, the main and additional electrodes 3 and
4 can be spaced intermittently at one-fourth of the magnetic field wave
length (FIG. 7). The operation of the device in this case is similar to
that described above.
Each of the proposed embodiments of the electromagnetic flowmeter has
definite advantages. For example, the embodiment of FIG. 2 using a
magnetic system with a magnetic flux which is not equal to zero is
preferable as for as the simplicity of the magnetic system design is
concerned. The well-known C-shaped, O-shaped, saddle-shaped and other
systems can be employed as the magnetic system in this embodiment. Such
systems show promise in facilitating thermal insulation of large-diameter
pipelines and high-temperature installations. However, the structural
design of a pipeline with the electrodes and metering circuit of this
embodiment is more complex.
The embodiment of the flowmeter using a magnetic system with a
sinusoidally-distributed magnetic field is simpler in that it is easier to
adapt a pipeline to electrodes arranged according to this system, it is
also possible in this embodiment to arrange the electrodes on one side of
the pipeline (FIG. 5) but this complicates the design of the magnetic
system.
All the embodiments of the proposed electromagnetic flowmeter make it
possible to conduct flow measurements (rate of flow) of a medium
irrespective of the magnitude of the magnetic field induction and final
effects, thereby enabling their characteristics to be rather accurately
calculated without calibrating such flowmeters in advance or performing
periodic calibrations in the course of operation.
* * * * *
|
|
|
|
|
Description  |
|